This report presents information tracking Cape Cod’s progress toward sustainability. It was prepared by the Sustainability Indicators Council under the auspices of the Cape Cod Center for Sustainability. It is designed as a decision-making tool for use by individuals, educators, and local and regional officials.
Sustainability was first defined in 1987 by the UN’s Bruntland Commission as “meeting the needs of the present without endangering the ability of future generations to meet their needs”. The definition spoke not only to the wise use of social, natural and economic resources today, but also to the long-term impacts that exist and the responsibility we bear to future generations for the management of those resources.
Since 1987, hundreds of organizations have addressed these issues and helped define sustainability in local, regional, state, national and international terms. It has become clear that the conventional method of measuring the “success” or “vitality” of a community or region relying solely on economic indicators is not adequate. Sustainability projects worldwide focus on the need to bring economic and environmental indicators into the decision-making progress, thus providing a broadbased and holistic picture of the health of the community. The growing number of communities engaging in sustainability projects speaks to its relevance to a community’s health and to individuals’ everyday lives.
In these times of economic, political and environmental change, when our future and so much around us is uncertain, it is appropriate to think about the legacy we are leaving our children and future generations. Hopefully, it will be one we can be proud of, one in which today’s decisions will not reduce tomorrow’s choices.
Sustainability and Cape Cod
The Cape Cod Center for Sustainability seeks to demonstrate that a sound economy, a healthy natural environment, and social justice for all are interconnected and essential to the future well-being of Cape Cod. The attainment of a sustainable future must be based on understanding and dealing with the inter-relationships among these three objectives. To accomplish its mission, the Center has offered a broad range of programs to encourage Cape Codders to think in a future-oriented mode and realize that today’s actions will have consequences in the future. The Sustainability Indicators Project grew out of the Center’s desire to define sustainability for Cape Cod, and the need to be inclusive in that process. The purpose of Cape Cod’s Sustainability Indicators Project is to track and evaluate our progress toward achieving a sustainable community for the long term using indicators in various aspects of our lives.
An indicator is something measurable that highlights where we are, where we want to be, and how well we are achieving that goal. Our indicators are based on the shared values of Cape Codders, and contain linkages to one or more other systems where a change in the status of one system will affect the status of another. A good indicator helps track the health of all the systems.
Sustainability Indicators Council
In spring of 1997, the Center formed the Sustainability Indicators Council to guide development of a relevant set of indicators. The 1997 Council was made up of 27 members. The 2002-2003 Council is made up of 12 community leaders representing all sectors and all regions of Cape Cod. The work of the Council has been an effective example of communication and cooperation by and among individuals and groups with divergent viewpoints, ideas, and approaches, who have come together to embrace the concept that measuring present trends is the key to determining our future. The coalescence of social, environmental and economic approaches jointly deals with the issue of sustainability, evidenced by this report and graphically represented on our front cover. It is our sincere hope that through this process the concentric portions of the three circles will continue to grow and expand.
Sustainability Indicators Project
In the fall of 1998, the Sustainability Indicators Council developed an initial set of 39 indicators, and public outreach efforts were conducted prior to selecting the final 12. In 1999, the first Sustainability Indicators Report was published.
In 2002, the Sustainability Indicators Council began meeting again to update and expand the 1999 report. The Council broke into three subcommittees, one each for social, environmental and economic indicators. Each subcommittee held meetings with focus groups that provided insights into choosing and gathering data for effective indicators. After evaluating the previous indicators (both initial and final) in light of these meetings, some were dropped, some were changed to provide more accurate data and analysis, and new ones were added.
The 2003 report contains 15 indicators. These indicators were compiled by members of the Council with significant assistance from the organizations, community representatives and individuals identified in the “Acknowledgements.” They present data about today’s Cape Cod. In many cases, they also include historical data. But in cases where historical data are not available or is difficult to come by, this report will serve as a baseline resource. Sources of data and information for each indicator are listed in the “Sources and Endnotes” at the end of the report.
Indicators to Action
The 1999 and 2003 Sustainability Indicators Reports have been created in order to give Cape Cod a comprehensive picture of our region’s health and vitality—to bring social, environmental and economic issues together in one place and track them over time.
The 15 social, economic and environmental indicators tracked by this report give a broad picture of sustainability on Cape Cod. The report highlights trends, both positive and negative. It also identifies many of the connections among social, environmental and economic issues, and provides insight on the relationships between each indicator and the Cape’s sustainability—i.e., if the numbers change, what does it mean for the long-term health of Cape Cod?
Two additional features of the report are noteworthy. For each indicator, individuals, communities and decision-makers are provided with recommendations for positive actions they can take toward making our region sustainable. In addition, each indicator includes a list of its most important goals in the first sidebar. These lists refer back to the set of goals and touchstones identified as intrinsic to a sustainable Cape Cod in “ An Uncertain Future” at the beginning of this report. By connecting individual indicators to economically, socially and environmentally sustainable outcomes, these lists suggest areas where concerted action might yield progress on several fronts.
The following questions require a Yes answer if an indicator is to be a valid one:
• Is the indicator timely?
• Can the indicator be measured? (i.e. is reliable data available?)
• Can the indicator be understood by the community?
• Does the indicator reflect a value widely held by Cape Codders?
• Does the indicator provide early warning of changes?
• Can the indicator be linked to other social, economic and environmental issues?
• Can a target be defined for the indicator that will be valid down the road?
• Can the indicator be influenced by changes in policy and/or individual behavior?
Indicators Covered by this Sustainability Indicators Report
• Civic Vitality - (Voting Patterns)
• Access To Healthcare - (HHS: Enrolled vs. Not In Healthcare Plan)
• Health Risks - (HHS: Substance Abuse)
• Youth Wellness - (High School Dropout Rates)
• Water Quality - (Drinking Water Quality and Quantity)
• Air Quality
• Land Use - (Land Developed and Land Protected)
• Waste Managment - (Incineration, Recycling, Composting & Landfilling)
• Energy Supply and Use
• Transportation & Mobility - (Traffic as Measured by Bridge Crossings)
• Workforce Housing - (Housing Affordability Gap)
• Building Human Capital
• Employment and Workforce Wages - (Employment and Payroll by Industry
• Tourism and Hospitality
• Retirement Economy
These fifteen indicators were selected by the council from a much larger list as the ones adhering most closely to the Indicator Criteria. However, many of those not selected for this have significant validity and will be reviewed for inclusion in the next Indicators Update Project.